Representatives continue to drive home a recurring theme in their efforts to drum up support for health care reform; universal coverage.
But universal coverage, or lack thereof isn’t the problem we should be focusing on, nor is it the central thrust of any of the bills coming out of Congress. The central focus of all the bills so far (the actual bills, not just the executive summaries) is directly and indirectly increasing taxes on Americans. Case in point, Senator Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., mentions cost problems with the most recent markup written by Senator Max Baucus, D-Mt.:
The Baucus proposal would impose, starting in 2013, a 35 percent excise tax on insurance companies for “high-cost plans” — defined as those above $8,000 for individuals and $21,000 for family plans.
The insurance companies aren’t going to absorb those costs, they’ll be passed on to their customers, making that a hidden tax. Senator Rockefeller get’s it:
[Senator Baucus] should understand that (his proposal) means that virtually every single coal miner is going to have a big, big tax put on them because the tax will be put on the company and the company will immediately pass it down and lower benefits because they are self insured, most of them, because they are larger. They will pass it down, lower benefits, and probably this will mean higher premiums for coal miners who are getting very good health care benefits for a very good reason. That is, like steelworkers and others, they are doing about the most dangerous job that can be done in America.
So that’s not really a smart idea, in fact, it’s a very dangerous idea, and I’m not even sure the coal miners in West Virginia are aware that this is what is waiting if this markup becomes law.
As I’ve said before, the amount of money the government stands to collect through supposed ‘health care reform’ represents quite a motive:
The tax contemplated by Baucus is also a big revenue raiser. It is expected to raise $200 billion, money that Baucus is hoping to use to pay for subsidies for the uninsured.
Senator Rockefeller has gone on record stating he will not support Baucus’ markup unless it receives a major overhaul in the amendment process.
Back to my original statement–this is all cloaked in the intention of covering the uninsured, which isn’t the core problem with health care right now. The core problem is cost, cost, cost. The reason the Democrats are selling these bills as champions of universal coverage is because it’s very difficult, nearly impossible to refute the need for universal coverage. The second one argues against universal coverage, despite the rational, he gets lambasted.
Using universal coverage as the main argument is also inline with Saul Alinsky’s second rule, which states “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” The cost of health care in the U.S. is an extremely complicated subject. Even the experts have difficulty explaining the high cost, its causes, and possible solutions. Therefore it’s much more effective to wrap health care reform in the baby-blanket of universal coverage, since few would argue against something so adorable.
Don’t be fooled. Approach these bills with a healthy skepticism. Read them and seek to understand them. If the bill doesn’t effectively reduce health care costs while remaining budget neutral, encourage your representatives to vote against it. Health care reform is something that will impact generations of Americans.
Similar Posts:
- Universal Health Care Isn’t The Solution
- The Problem Is Cost
- More Misinformation From The White House
- Debunking Obama’s debunkery
- Health Care Reform; A Primary Care Physician’s Perspective
- Health Care Reform Should Be Left To The Individual States
- Pelosi’s Health Care Reform Bill Against Tort Reform
- Lobbyists Are Driving Health Care Reform
- Democrats
Weasel TowardsRegain Supermajority - AFLCIO already behind H.R. 3962